Saturday, August 8, 2015

Blogpost 9- We Make the Road by Walking, Chapter 3 Ideas

“We Make the Road by Walking”
By: Myles Horton and Paulo Freire
Chapter 3: Ideas

Factual Question:
What is the definition of an idea?
According to merriam-webster.com a medical definition of idea is an entity (as a thought, concept, sensation, or image) actually or potentially present to consciousness; as a formulated thought or opinion.

Evaluative Statement:
I feel like a first idea of reading should be, if it not already is, would be to sketch out, or think out, ideas of the titles of the books, or chapters, and interpret what it is about before you read it. Ideas as an entire concept are an incredibly important skill that educators instill in their students. As educators it is necessary to teach children that there are so many ideas that they can create and input in the world to make a difference. A practice that I am passionate about incorporating in my teaching style, creativity stimulation to produce great ideas and futures in my students. I have done a lot of research on the benefits of art in a child’s life, with so many positive benefits of a creative mind. Without the history of these creative people, we wouldn’t have all of the futuristic technology that we have today. I can bet that most of the inventors, artists, educators, successors had history of drawing/painting, reading/writing, music, with so many options of performing arts it combines a community of creative ideas that stem from an individual idea.
So using this skill of creating a hypothesis of the chapter, and my previous knowledge of the book, I interpreted that the two authors would discuss how their ideas were not always favored by others, and I ended up being correct. The chapter started off with such a powerful quote, “Without practice there’s no knowledge.” The whole concept of learning and of life is that it happens in time, with the creation of new knowledge. The idea of these two authors, is that they both started off with similar yet different backgrounds and grew to create similar ideas and became friends and educators with circumstances that got them to write a story about their successful experiences. A concept that everybody has knowledge, but the extent of the knowledge is expressed differently with different individuals.
Conflict can arise when one doesn’t believe in the idea or action of another person. The right thing when conflict arises, that the authors expressed, was to view ideas in hopes to get hem heard as well as listening to and acknowledging other ideas as being that individuals and their right to have them. Everybody has a right to their own individuality and the way it is expressed should not concern other people, the person should be concerned in their own ideas and opinions. Morality comes in when the beliefs have a good impact on others, and should be exposed to others. The concept of critical pedagogy and social foundations to me is to have these learning experiences, from different classes and viewpoints, to help mold our individual educational policy and practice.

Interpretive Question:

When the author Paulo says “Do the people have the right or not, in the process of taking their history into their hands, to develop another kind of language as a dimension of those who have the power?” The question is asked by asking if people have the right or not to know better then what they already know. I think this question is answered in the knowledge of other ideas with practice, so yes people should know better and know different concepts that can be formed individually or with the help of an outside source. 

Tuesday, August 4, 2015

Blogpost 8- We Make the Road by Walking, Chapter 2

FEI Blogpost 8

We Make the Road by Walking, Chapter 2

Factual Question:
What is the definition of aesthetic?
According to merriam-webster.com Aesthetic is of, relating to, or dealing with aesthetics or the beautiful; artistic; pleasing in appearance; appreciative of, responsive to, or zealous about the beautiful, responsive to or appreciative of what is pleasurable to the senses.”

Evaluative Statement:
How do we make our lives balanced and aesthetic? A thought that this question is brought up in many parts of our lives, is change good? We are infinitely changing beings that go through changes on a daily basis. I started off with this thought perplexing realization quote that Myles expresses in the Formative Years in We Make the Road by Walking.  “And the other thing I would hope to do would be to make it clear that my ideas have changed and are constantly changing and should change and that I’m as proud of my inconsistencies as I am my consistencies.” We wouldn’t be here on earth without change, mistakes, and successes, so I believe that most definitely change is a great thing. An open mind is a receptive, intelligent, progressive mind that should be adopted in more people’s lifestyles. This is relevant in our educational and critical pedagogy to understand our teaching, learning, and changing school systems.  Myles later states that “I can remember very well that I never felt sorry for myself. I just accepted the fact that those were the conditions and that I was a victim of those conditions, but I never had any feelings of inferiority to other people. Because it was the system’s fault and not the people’s.” Another concept that we need to be more receptive and progressive about, how do we change the system? The two authors talk about their experiences that helped change and mold their lives for the better. A great educational learning process that led them to successful lives. Myles had a realistic approach not looking at the different classes for rankings of superiority and inferiority, but to the people for being the people and dividing the system to be the rankings and unaware of the people. It is relevant in the education and instruction in our society because it needs to be divided when it comes to our students and the treatment that people are receiving. We need equality in our world, and I think great ways to express that is being balanced in ourselves. As Myles and Paulo were discussing their early education and their common desire to read, Paulo expresses, “I think that it’s very interesting, because sometimes we can fall into some mistakes, for example, the mistake of denying the value of books, the value of reading or denying the value of practice. I think we have to understand how books as theory and practice as action must be constantly dialectically together, that is, as a unity between practice and theory.” I thought it was interesting how Paulo correlates imbalanced mistakes, to the value of practice and reading. As a practicing yogi, I love incorporating the yin yang into balancing my life. According to yin yang philosophy the universe, and everything in it, is both constant and cyclical. One force dominates and then it is replaced by the opposing force. This is exemplified in every part of life and death, night and day, dark and light, the activities are endless. With every action there is a reaction, which the authors exemplify in their actions of reading causes reactions of education and desire to keep learning as well as teach. The authors convey how unfortunately most students give reading negative connotations by being forced to read as students. If we teach reading as an act of individuality and beauty, instead of curriculum it can become more desired for students. An important concept regardless is to have an unconditional appreciation for all humans, students and teachers, in their endeavors of balance, independence, diversity, and happiness.


Interpretive Question:
When the author Paulo states that “for me the scientist who is not able to write beautifully minimizes his or her science and falls into an ideological lie, according to which the scientists have to escape from the beauty” I believe that he means that for it to be a true science it needs to be expressed in not only the action of the process, but the reaction of the response of the process. I’m not sure if that is what he means though because he originally states that the thought of people is that scientist are not obliged to grasp the aesthetical moment of language, but it is beautiful when they do, right?